1. Executive Summary

‍

Brief overview of industry marketing trends

The Commercial EV Charging industry has transitioned from early market evangelism to a proof-of-concept, ROI-value-driven marketing approach. With the growth of infrastructure and increasing competition, marketing is no longer about “why EV charging” but “why us.” Customers demand hard proof of uptime, interoperability, speed of deployment, and total cost of ownership (TCO).

Marketing leaders in the industry are allocating budgets to measurable, demand-capturing marketing channels (search, ABM, lifecycle email) while increasing attribution between marketing efforts and actual charging infrastructure deployments or contracted sites.

‍

Shifts in customer acquisition strategies

The following are the key acquisition changes that have been noted among the leading players in the Commercial EV Charging industry:

• From broad awareness to account-based growth
  
  
  
  • Target fleets, multi-site retailers, logistics companies, utilities, and municipalities where a single sale opens up multiple-site deployments.
    
    
• From sustainability-first to economics-first messaging
  
  
  
  • While green value is still significant, customers are now driven by operational success, revenue per stall, grid connectivity, and incentive program expertise.
    
    
• From campaign-led to lifecycle-led marketing
  
  
  
  • Customers have longer sales cycles that involve multiple stakeholders (operations, finance, sustainability, and real estate).
    
    
• From third-party targeting to first-party data
  
  
  
  • Privacy shifts and signal degradation drive teams towards CRM-driven targeting, offline conversion import, and contextual media.
    
    

‍

Summary of performance benchmarks (high-level)

B2B infrastructure and industrial sectors (best-fit benchmarks):

• Paid Search: Highest intent and quickest pipeline impact, but increasing CPCs demand more precise keyword management and landing page control.
  
  
• SEO & Content: Lower-funnel growth, but best long-term CAC ROI—particularly for incentives, permitting, and ROI education.
  
  
• Email: Most efficient for retention, expansion, and multi-party alignment in complex sales.
  
  
• Paid Social (LinkedIn-dominant): Best for ABM and reactivation, not cold prospecting.
  
  

In short, the best performers are not spending more—they're converting more of what they already get.

‍

Key takeaways

1. The commercial EV charging marketing space has evolved: customers require proof, not promises.
   
   
2. Account-based approaches beat volume-driven tactics in this market.
   
   
3. Operational credibility (availability, deployment certainty, standards readiness) is the most compelling differentiator.
   
   
4. Measurement rigor is now a key differentiator, not a basic requirement.
   
   
5. Lifecycle marketing (not one-off campaigns) drives the highest LTV.

‍

Quick Stats Snapshot

2) Market Context & Industry Overview

‍

Total addressable market (TAM)

Since “Commercial EV Charging” involves HW/SW, installation, and operational services, most publicly available TAM data follows the overall EV charging station market. A commonly cited estimate puts the global EV charging station market at ~$39.7B in 2024 with ~24.4% CAGR from 2025-2034. (Global Market Insights Inc.)

How to apply this to a “commercial” TAM focus (practical segmentation):

• Fleet & depot charging (HDV/MDV + last-mile): route electrification & depot capacity limitations (utility coordination is part of the solution).
  
  
• Public + destination charging (CPO/site host): usage economics, availability, payments/roaming, and site acquisition are key drivers of profitability.
  
  
• Workplace + multifamily: portfolio sales; policy & property operations drive significant impact.
  
  

Growth rate of the sector (YoY, 5-year trends)

A very direct growth signal is infrastructure scale:

• A very straightforward indicator of growth is the size of the infrastructure: IEA forecasts that the global number of public charging spots will surpass 15M by 2030, a four-fold increase from the nearly 4M in 2023. (IEA)
  
  

This means:

• More buying cycles (utilities, site hosts, fleets)
  
  
• More competitors
  
  
• A shift in marketing from “category education” to “proof and differentiation”
  
  

Digital adoption rate within the sector

In commercial charging, “digital adoption” refers to the following software-defined experience expected by buyers:

• Operational software: remote monitoring, availability analytics, pricing, demand management, fleet scheduling
  
  
• Customer experience: simple, reliable, and transparently priced charging + interoperability between networks
  
  

The IEA clearly emphasizes that charging services should be “easy to use, reliable and transparently priced,” and that interoperability is important for investments in charging infrastructure/services. (IEA)

Marketing maturity: early, maturing, saturated

Maturing. Indicators:

• Market expansion is encouraging new market entrants and investment (TAM growth + deployment targets). (Global Market Insights Inc., IEA)
  
  
• Differentiation is shifting from mission statements to execution (uptime, deployment predictability, service model, interoperability) messaging. (IEA)

‍

Industry Digital Ad Spend Over Time

Marketing Budget Allocation

3) Audience & Buyer Behavior Insights

‍

ICP (Ideal Customer Profile) details

Commercial EV charging has several ICPs because the buyer is not necessarily the end user. The most valuable ICPs are those in which a single win can lead to multi-site deployments:

ICP Cluster A — Fleets (highest deal size / expansion potential)

• Who: logistics (last-mile & regional), transit authorities, municipal fleets, school buses, rental fleets
  
  
• Primary value driver: depot throughput & operating cost & uptime & load management
  
  
• Buying trigger: vehicle purchase milestones, depot capacity constraints, fuel price volatility, grant schedules
  
  

ICP Cluster B — Site hosts (multi-site, utilization-based)

• Who: big-box & grocery, convenience & QSR, parking operators, REITs, airports & hospitality
  
  
• Primary value driver: utilization economics & revenue share & brand benefit & tenant & guest satisfaction
  
  
• Buying trigger: competitive deployments, EV traffic increases, corridor development, property refresh cycles
  
  

ICP Cluster C — Utilities / energy partners

• Who: utility program managers, energy service companies, aggregators
  
  
• Primary value driver: grid impact management & managed charging adoption & program performance
  
  
• Buying trigger: regulatory submissions, make-ready investments, interconnection queues
  
  

ICP Cluster D — Public sector

• Who: municipalities, state governments, universities
  
  
• Primary value driver: compliance & budget certainty & vendor risk mitigation
  
  
• Buying trigger: RFP cycles, earmarks & grants, emissions reduction goals
  
  

‍

Key demographic and psychographic trends (for B2B buyers)

What’s changing in “why they buy”

• From mission-led to risk-led: Sustainability is Still Relevant, but Now Deployment Risk, Uptime, & Economics are Key Factors
  
  
• Proof-seeking behavior: Buyers Seek Verifiable Performance, Not Feature Sheets
  
  
• Preference for standardization: Interoperability & Compatibility are Fast Becoming the New Norm (Connector + Roaming + Payment Experience)
  
  
• Increased scrutiny on data & measurement: Vendor Response to Privacy-Driven Signal Loss Means More Focus on First-Party Data & Better Attribution Hygiene
  
  

‍

Buyer journey mapping (online vs. offline)

For the EV charging sector, the buying journey is a hybrid model with the following characteristics:

Online Dominates

• Discovery (Search, Industry Media, LinkedIn)
  
  
• Early Evaluation (Webinars, Specs, Incentives, ROI Calculators)
  
  
• Vendor Shortlist (Case Studies, Certifications, Standards Readiness, Partner Ecosystem)
  
  

Offline Dominates

• Site Assessments/Depot Audits
  
  
• Utility Coordination & Interconnection Planning
  
  
• Permitting & Construction Timelines
  
  
• Procurement/Legal (MSA, SLAs, Warranties, Financing)
  
  

Implication for marketing: You should think of “conversion” as a series of steps (MQL, meeting, site assessment, proposal, contract), not simply a web form.

‍

Shifts in expectations (privacy, personalization, speed)

Speed

• “Time-to-operational” has become an expectation. Buyers will fault those who cannot demonstrate a credible operational plan.
  
  

Personalization

• Buyers expect role-based content: ops, finance, sustainability, real estate. The generic “one-pager” simply doesn’t perform.
  
  

Reliability + Transparency

• The IEA defines successful charging as easy to use, reliable, transparently priced, and interoperability as important for scaling charging investments.
  
  

Privacy + Measurement

• With platform-level tracking unknowns, the advantage will go to those who can:
  
  
  
  • Build first-party audiences: CRM and site engagement
    
    
  • Import offline conversions: meetings, proposals, wins
    
    
  • Conduct incrementality tests where possible

‍

Persona Snapshot Table

Funnel Flow Diagram of Customer Journey

4) Channel Performance Breakdown

‍

Given that commercial EV charging marketing is both B2B, high consideration, and multi-stakeholder, channel “performance” should be measured by pipeline creation (SQLs/SQOs) and deal velocity, not form fills alone. That being said, here are some data-backed benchmark ranges you can use to plan and diagnose with:

Channel efficiency table (benchmarks + EV-charging interpretation)

Notes on Comparability

• “Paid channels: CPC/CVR/CPL benchmarks are from cross-industry datasets; EV charging typically prices at the higher end when targeting fleets, utilities, and enterprise site hosts.
  
  
• ““CAC” below is framed as cost per customer acquisition from a marketing-sourced lead, and will swing massively depending on your lead→SQL and SQL→Won rates.”

Campaign benchmarks you can actually plan with (how to model CAC)

Use this simple formula:

CAC ≈ CPL ÷ (Lead→SQL) / (SQL→Won)

Example using Industrial & Commercial paid search benchmark CPL $77.48 (WordStream)

• If Lead→SQL = 10% and SQL→Won = 10% ⇒ CAC ≈ 77.48 / 0.10 / 0.10 ≈ $7,748
  
  
• If Lead→SQL = 5% and SQL→Won = 4% ⇒ CAC ≈ 77.48 / 0.05 / 0.04 ≈ $38,740
  
  

This is why EV charging marketers who “generate leads” but cannot prove SQL quality will mistakenly assume a channel is underperforming when, in fact, the problem lies in qualification, routing, and follow-up speed.

‍

Top-performing channel patterns in Commercial EV Charging

• Paid Search dominates when you have (1) a tight keyword set, (2) strong landing pages per ICP, and (3) conversion tracking that reflects real buying signals (assessment request, proposal request, booked meeting).
  
  
• LinkedIn wins as ABM, not broad prospecting: keep audiences small (account lists + retargeting), rotate creative frequently, and optimize to down-funnel events (qualified meetings) rather than CTR alone. (AgencyAnalytics)
  
  
• Meta Lead Ads can be a cost-efficient complement for Industrial & Commercial categories (not always intuitive in B2B), but you must design for lead quality (conditional logic, required fields, enrichment, rapid routing). (WordStream)
  
  
• Email + CRM orchestration is your “margin channel”: and it just won’t drive new demand as quickly, but it will help conversion rate and expansion in a meaningful way.

‍

% of Budget Allocation by Channel

5) Top Tools & Platforms by Sector

‍

Marketers of commercial EV charging infrastructure resemble B2B infrastructure & enterprise SaaS, with long sales cycles, multiple decision-makers, and offline conversion processes. This likely means a CRM-based attribution approach, with account-based sales execution & operationally focused content (uptime, utilization, etc.).

‍

The “default” winning stack (what high-performing teams converge on)

System of record (Revenue / Pipeline)

• CRM: Salesforce (Enterprise), Hubspot (Mid-Market/Growth), Microsoft Dynamics (Enterprise-heavy IT infrastructure). CRM spend is heavily concentrated in large enterprises. (HG Insights, APPS RUN THE WORLD)
  
  

Demand engine (capture & nurture)

• B2B Marketing Automation Platforms: HubSpot, Adobe Marketo, Salesforce (Pardot/Marketing Cloud Account Engagement), Oracle Eloqua (enterprise).
  
  
  
  • The broader marketing automation market appears to be growing, which suggests that marketing automation tools will continue to be a key area of investment within organizations. (Mordor Intelligence)
    
    
  • Gartner recognizes a dedicated category for B2B marketing automation platforms, which could be useful in comparing tools & vendor reviews. (Gartner)
    
    

Account-based (ABM / buying groups)

• ABM platforms: 6sense & Demandbase are always included as a “Leader” option in the Gartner ABM Platforms Magic Quadrant, by vendor disclosure & Gartner category definition. (6sense, Gartner, Demandbase)
  
  

Analytics + measurement

• Web analytics: GA4 with server-side tagging where possible to avoid privacy & signal degradation
  
  
• BI: Looker, Power BI
  
  
• Attribution plumbing: Offline conversion events (meetings, assessments, proposals), CRM opportunity stage mapping
  
  

Data unification

• CDP / customer data tooling (as needed): Segment, Tealium, Salesforce/Adobe stacks in enterprise.
  
  
  
  • The CDP market continues to expand rapidly, fueled by the need for data-driven marketing. (Global Market Insights Inc., MarketsandMarkets)
    
    

Which martech tools are gaining vs. losing momentum (practical read)

Gaining adoption

1. ABM platforms + account intent
   
   
   
   • Because EV charging has high ACVs and expansion of multiple locations, account lists, buying groups, and intent are generally more effective than volume lead-gen.
     
     
   • ABM platforms are defined by Gartner as discovery/selection, engagement, and reporting. This is exactly what EV charging needs to find fleets, utilities, and multi-site hosts. (Gartner)
     
     
2. CDPs / identity + audience building
   
   
   
   • Signal loss makes first-party audiences more important, especially for retageting and lifecycle marketing.
     
     
   • The growth rate of the CDP market remains high in major market reports. (Global Market Insights Inc., MarketsandMarkets)
     
     
3. Marketing automation (still growing)
   
   
   
   • The marketing automation software market will continue to grow through 2030. This supports the importance of “automation + nurture” in long sales cycles common in B2B. (Mordor Intelligence)
     
     
4. Conversation intelligence + pipeline hygiene
   
   
   
   • Not "market-share cited," but in practice: we're using conversation intelligence tools because that’s where EV charging deals are moving: assessment, proposal, legal.
     
     

Losing momentum (or getting consolidated)

1. Point-solution analytics that doesn’t connect to CRM opportunity stages
   
   
   
   • Point solution tools that cannot connect spend, meetings, assessments, and pipeline will be replaced by CRM native or warehouse-based measurement tools.
     
     
2. Standalone “lead-gen” tools without enrichment + routing
   
   
   
   • Quality of EV charging leads varies, and teams will favor stacks that include tools to enrich, score, and schedule follow-up activities based on SLAs.
     
     

Key integrations being adopted (what actually matters operationally)

Integration 1: Paid media ↔ CRM (offline conversion loop)

• Import qualified meetings, site assessments, and proposals back into Google/LinkedIn as offline conversions to optimize toward pipeline, not clicks.
  
  

Integration 2: Website engagement ↔ account lists (ABM)

• Link website engagement metrics to ABM tools to inform sales teams about which accounts are actively engaging with pricing, incentives, and uptime content.
  
  

Integration 3: Product/ops proof → marketing assets

• If you operate chargers (CPO) or provide managed services, connect uptime, utilization, and response time metrics to:
  
  
  
  • Case studies
    
    
  • ROI calculators
    
    
  • Sales enablement “proof packs”
    
    

Integration 4: Partner ecosystems

• Track partner-sourced leads as a first-class object within CRM, including EPC, utility, and OEM attribution and shared SLAs.

‍

Toolscape Quadrant: Adoption vs. Satisfaction

6) Creative & Messaging Trends

‍

Commercial EV charging creative is shifting from “future of EV” storytelling to risk reduction + proof + deployment certainty. As networks expand, buyer trust is now based on reliability, interoperability, transparent economics, and “time to operational” clarity—in other words, exactly what’s covered in public sector reliability guidelines such as uptime and data transparency expectations. (driveelectric.gov, ABB Library)

‍

CTAs, hooks, and messaging types that perform best

What’s converting now (by buyer intent)

High-intent (conversion-stage) hooks

• “Uptime you can verify” (dashboards, SLAs, maintenance response times)
  
  
  
  • Reliability expectations are explicitly defined in terms of uptime requirements (e.g., 97%) and public data availability in reliability guidelines. (driveelectric.gov, ABB Library)
    
    
• “Deployment certainty” - a permitting and utility coordination plan, timeline, and risk reduction checklist
• “Economics you can defend” (TCO, utilization, demand-charge strategy, financing options)
  
  
• “Interoperability / future-proofing” (connector and roaming/payment expectations)
  
  

CTAs that reliably outperform generic “Contact Sales” in this category

• “Get a site feasibility and ROI model”
  
  
• “Request a depot load plan”
  
  
• “Check incentive eligibility” – particularly strong for public sector and site hosts
  
  
• “See an uptime and reliability report”
  
  
• “Book a 15-minute infrastructure assessment”
  
  

Why these work: They align with buyer pain points and bottlenecks, rather than asking for commitment too early.

‍

Emerging creative formats (what’s rising and why it works)

Format trends to prioritize

1. Short-form video (B2B is adopting it faster)
   
   
   
   • B2B video remains a highly engaging content type and an excellent way to communicate complex ideas quickly and simply. (HubSpot Blog, EMARKETER)
     
     
   • For EV charging, the best short-form content is not video, it’s “proof” content: “before and after uptime,” “install timeline,” “live monitoring,” “fleet workflow demo.”
     
     
2. “Document-style” assets (carousels / PDF-style explainers)
   
   
   
   • Works well because commercial EV charging buyers are research-heavy and need artifacts they can forward internally (ops/finance/legal).
     
     
3. UGC-style authenticity (adapted for B2B)
   
   
   
   • In the EV charging industry, “UGC” typically refers to customer voices, such as tech field walk-throughs, host site testimonials, and quotes from fleet managers—unpolished and authentic.
     
     
4. Interactive calculators
   
   
   
   • “ROI / Demand Charge / Utilization” calculators are some of the most successful mid-funnel assets because they help buyers turn intangible benefits into tangible business decisions.
     
     

Sector-specific messaging insights (what to emphasize by ICP)

Fleet depot (Ops-led)

• Message pillars: throughput, uptime, workflow, and load management.
• Proof: scheduling demo, “day-in-the-life” ops walkthrough video, reliability metrics
  
  

Site host (Real estate / revenue-led)

• Message pillars: utilization economics, revenue share, and low op-ex.
• Proof: pro forma, utilization ranges by similar site type, service model.
  
  

Utilities / energy partners

• Message pillars: grid impact, managed charging, and reporting
• Proof: interconnection plan templates, measurement/reporting samples
  
  

Public sector

• Message pillars: compliance, uptime, accessibility, and transparent pricing
• Proof: RFP-ready documentation, uptime standard alignment, public data sharing approach (driveelectric.gov, ABB Library)

‍

Swipe-File Style Example Gallery

Best-Performing Ad Headline Formats

7) Case Studies: Winning Campaigns (last 12 months)

‍

The following are three campaign archetypes that have consistently beaten the curve in Commercial EV Charging because they target the areas where it matters most for the customer: trust, ease of use, and certainty of deployment.

‍

Campaign 1 — EVgo “Frictionless Charging + Network Growth” (Product-led demand + retention)

Timeframe: Q3 2025 reporting period (results published Nov 10, 2025) (EVgo)
Primary goal: Grow usage, retention, and increase perception of convenience (removes charging anxiety)
Audience: EV drivers; indirectly impacts interest from commercial partners

Channel mix (likely, based on typical network GTM)

• App + product UX messaging (Autocharge+), CRM/lifecycle (email/app), partnerships, and PR/earned media
  
  

Key “offer” / hook

• “Charging that just works” – fewer steps at the charger with Autocharge+
  
  

Reported performance signals

• Network throughput: 95 GWh in Q3 2025 (+25% YoY) (EVgo)
  
  
• Avg daily throughput per stall: 295 kWh/day (+16% YoY) (EVgo)
  
  
• Customer accounts added: 149,000+ in the quarter (1.6M total) (EVgo)
  
  
• Autocharge+ adoption: 28% of charging sessions initiated in Q3 2025 (EVgo)
  
  

Why it worked (marketing strategy insight)

• It’s all about friction reduction, not just brand marketing. The real magic happens when the charging session is initiated.
  
  
• KPI ladder (nice and simple): feature adoption → session starts → throughput → revenue.
  
  

Steal this playbook

• Identify a single UX improvement that you can measure, which is a good indicator of a micro-conversion, and is a good indicator of future revenue.
  
  

‍

Campaign 2 — Electrify America “Trust + Reliability Story (backed by scale metrics)” (Brand + utilization proof)

Timeframe: 2024 results published March 7, 2025 (energytech.com)
Primary goal: Build trust and preference for Electrify America through a sense of momentum – measured in sessions and energy delivered.
Audience: Electrify American customers, strategic site partners, and policymakers.

Channel mix

• PR and earned media, owned content – annual report highlights, partnership announcements, site-level visibility.
  
  

Key “proof points” used in messaging

• 16M+ charging sessions in 2024 and over 600 GWh delivered, or 65% more output than in 2023. (energytech.com)
  
  
• Network scale: Over 4,800 public charging points across our network of over 1,000 stations. (energytech.com)
  
  
• Partner distribution: Collaborating with Costco Wholesale (5 locations) (energytech.com)
  
  
• Ongoing regulatory reporting cadence (CARB report index) (California Air Resources Board)
  
  

Why it worked

• In a market where reliability and availability are job number one, EA relied on hard metrics – actual utilization and actual energy delivered.
  
  
• The partnership with Costco Wholesale was a shortcut to trust – a well-known brand in high-traffic locations.
  
  

Steal this playbook

• Create a series of “Proof of Network / Proof of Operations” content pieces that highlight:
  
  
  
  • Sessions, energy delivered, uptime/availability, response time, deployment velocity
    
    
  • Packaged for PR + sales enablement + partner recruiting.
    
    

‍

Campaign 3 — ChargePoint + Qmerit “Deployment Certainty via Partner-Led Rollouts” (B2B pipeline + multi-site expansion)

Timeframe: Case study published 2025 (PDF) (Qmerit)
Primary goal: Secure multi-site commercial deals by removing installation/permitting risk
Audience: Fleet managers, cities, commercial site owners; internal buying group (ops + facilities + procurement)

Channel mix

• Partner co-marketing case study, sales enablement, account-based marketing targeting verticals: fleet managers, site owners, co-marketing with partners
  
  

Core message

• “Simplify the entire process from site assessment to permitting to installation to commissioning to maintenance.” (Qmerit)
  
  

Concrete deployment proof in the case study

• 29 Sherwin-Williams facilities: installation/commissioning of ChargePoint CPF50 Level 2 chargers for fleet operations (Qmerit)
  
  
• City of Little Rock: multiple city locations with CT4000 dual-port Level 2 charging (Qmerit)
  
  
• Graton Casino: Express 250 DC fast + CP6000 Level 2 installed in a parking garage (Qmerit)
  
  
• ChargePoint scale context: 329,000+ activated ports worldwide (Qmerit)

Why it worked

• Product is not the hardware/software; it’s the execution capability
  
  
• This case study speaks to the fears and pain points of the target audience
  
  

Steal this playbook

• “Deployment certainty” as a marketing asset:
  
  
  
  • Publish rollout templates, permitting checklist, interconnection timeline, and partner-backed service level agreements
  • Highlight the successful rollout as a case study to be replicated across multiple sites

‍

Campaign Card Template: Before/After Metrics and Creative Used

8) Marketing KPIs & Benchmarks by Funnel Stage

‍

Commercial EV charging is a long-cycle, multi-stakeholder B2B motion. The most useful benchmark model is stage-based (Awareness → Consideration → Conversion → Retention/Expansion), with offline conversions (meeting booked, site assessment completed, proposal requested) treated as primary success metrics—not just form fills.

‍

Benchmarks table by funnel stage

How to read this table:
“Average” is what many B2B industrial/commercial teams see; “Industry high” is a practical “top quartile / strong” target.

What to benchmark specifically for Commercial EV Charging (recommended KPI stack)

Because “lead” quality varies wildly here, add these EV-charging-native conversion KPIs to your dashboards:

• Qualified meeting rate (Lead → meeting booked)
  
  
• Site assessment rate (Meeting → assessment scheduled/completed)
  
  
• Proposal request rate (Assessment → proposal requested)
  
  
• Pipeline created per 1,000 visits (or per $1k spend)
  
  
• Multi-site expansion velocity (site #2/#3 conversion time)

‍

Funnel Chart

9) Marketing Challenges & Opportunities

‍

Key challenges shaping GTM performance

1) Rising ad costs + auction volatility

• Paid search costs continue to rise across industries; WordStream reports CPC increased for 87% of industries and notes a multi-year cost increase trend. (WordStream)
  
  
• On LinkedIn (core B2B channel), recent benchmark reporting shows median CPC ~$3.94 and median CPM ~$31–$38 (often higher in competitive categories). (Closely)
  Implication for EV charging: You can’t “bid your way out.” Efficiency comes from ICP precision + offer-led conversion events (assessment/feasibility/ROI model) and offline conversion optimization (meetings, assessments).
  
  

2) Privacy + measurement constraints (signal loss is now permanent, not “incoming”)

• IAB’s State of Data 2024 shows 95% of decision-makers expect continued privacy legislation + signal loss “in 2024 and beyond,” and 82% say organizational structure has already been impacted. (IAB)
  
  
• Google also reversed its plan to fully deprecate third-party cookies in Chrome (moving toward a user choice model), which prolongs uncertainty and reinforces “prepare for mixed reality” measurement. (The Current)
  Implication: Attribution will stay messy. Winning teams shift to first-party data + CRM stage measurement and treat platform-reported ROAS as directional.
  
  

3) Compliance / reliability expectations raise the bar for claims

• NEVI-funded chargers must meet >97% annual uptime per port (CFR 680.116), which increases scrutiny on reliability proof and SLA language. (Joint Office of Energy & Transport)
  Implication: Marketing claims need audit-ready substantiation (uptime definitions, measurement methodology, escalation SLAs). Weak proof creates reputational risk.
  
  

4) Organic reach decay + “zero-click” behavior

• In B2B research-heavy categories, prospects increasingly consume answers in-platform (search results, social posts, AI summaries), reducing click-through—even when awareness is rising.
  Implication: Your content must be designed to win the snippet / win the feed, while still capturing downstream intent (retargeting pools, demo/assessment triggers).
  
  

‍

Major opportunities (where the best teams are leaning in)

1) First-party data & lifecycle advantages

• IAB shows investment in web analytics tools, CDPs, identity solutions, and consent/compliance stacks as key first-party enablers. (IAB)
  Opportunity move: Build an “account memory” system: pages viewed (incentives, uptime, pricing), stakeholder roles, timeline stage → mapped to CRM and nurture.
  
  

2) AI-assisted personalization (with governance)

• IAB reports 32% are already using AI/ML to enhance first-party consumer profiles/records, and about one-third of training focus includes AI/ML and data modeling. (IAB)
  Opportunity move: Use AI for content variation + intent classification + routing, but keep claims and numbers human-verified (especially on reliability/ROI).
  
  

3) Proof-driven differentiation (reliability + deployment certainty)

• With uptime standards tightening (e.g., NEVI), “proof” becomes a sustainable moat: uptime reporting, response SLAs, deployment velocity, and utilization transparency. (Joint Office of Energy & Transport)
  Opportunity move: Publish a quarterly “Operations Proof Pack” (uptime methodology, response times, deployment timelines, case studies) used across PR, sales, and partner recruitment.
  
  

4) Partner ecosystems as a distribution channel

• EV charging deals are frequently partner-mediated (EPCs, utilities, OEMs, fleet consultants).
  Opportunity move: Treat partners like a performance channel: co-branded assets, shared SLAs, and partner-sourced pipeline attribution.

‍

Risk / Opportunity Quadrant

10) Strategic Recommendations

‍

Suggested playbooks by company maturity

A) Startup (0–$3M ARR or early commercial traction)

Goal: Prove repeatable pipeline creation with tight ICP focus.

What to do

• Own 1–2 ICPs (e.g., fleet depot + regional site hosts) and build one offer that maps to real buying steps: “Site feasibility + ROI model” or “Depot load plan assessment.”
  
  
• Paid Search first (high intent): In Industrial & Commercial, average CPC ~$4.95 and CVR ~6.84% are realistic planning anchors. (WordStream)
  
  
  
  • Track conversions as qualified meeting / assessment requested, not “lead.”
    
    
• Foundational SEO (not “blogging”): publish “must-win” pages that buyers actually search:
  
  
  
  • incentives by state/utility, permitting checklists, interconnection timelines, demand-charge mitigation, fleet depot design.
    
    
• CRM hygiene from day 1: if privacy/signal loss is expected to continue long-term (95% of decision-makers expect continued signal loss/privacy legislation), you must measure in CRM stages. (IAB)
  
  

Success metric stack

• Cost per qualified meeting, assessment rate, and pipeline created per $1k spend (not MQL volume).
  
  

‍

B) Growth (repeatable motion; scaling pipeline)

Goal: Increase pipeline while controlling CAC via ABM + lifecycle.

What to do

• Add LinkedIn ABM + retargeting: Benchmarks to plan around: median CPC ~$3.94, CPM ~$31–$38, CTR ~0.52%. (Closely)
  
  
  
  • Use LinkedIn mainly to reach buying groups (Ops + Facilities + Finance + Sustainability), then retarget with proof assets.
    
    
• Offline conversion optimization: import “qualified meeting,” “assessment completed,” and “proposal requested” back to ad platforms. This is how you stay effective under signal loss. (IAB)
  
  
• Proof-pack marketing: publish reliability + ops documentation regularly (uptime methodology, response SLAs, MTTR, deployment timelines). This matters even more where NEVI requires >97% annual uptime per port (and also requires transparent pricing display rules). (eCFR)
  
  

Success metric stack

• Lead→SQL, SQL→proposal, pipeline velocity, and expansion pipeline (multi-site).
  
  

‍

C) Scale (enterprise + multi-region + partner ecosystems)

Goal: Turn marketing into a predictable revenue system (and reduce blended CAC).

What to do

• Partner GTM as a performance channel: EPCs, utilities, OEMs. Treat partner-sourced pipeline like paid media with SLAs, attribution rules, and quarterly co-marketing calendars.
  
  
• Data unification: prioritize first-party data governance and measurement investments because the ecosystem continues shifting “privacy-by-design.” (IAB)
  
  
• Verticalized messaging systems: separate creative systems by ICP (fleet vs site host vs public sector/NEVI vs utilities), with proof and compliance artifacts baked in.
  
  

Success metric stack

• Pipeline per target account, win-rate uplift from ABM, renewal influence, and site #2/#3 conversion time.
  
  

‍

Best channels to invest in (and why, with planning benchmarks)

1) Paid Search (capture demand you can’t manufacture)

• Use Industrial & Commercial baselines: CPC ~$4.95; CVR ~6.84%; CPL ~$77.48 as planning benchmarks. (WordStream)
  Invest when: you have clear ICP keywords + strong landing pages + ability to optimize to real conversions (meetings/assessments).
  
  

2) SEO + “decision assets” (compounding CAC reducer)

• Invest when you can publish operationally credible content (incentives, permitting, interconnection, TCO). This turns into the cheapest sustainable acquisition over 6–12 months.
  
  

3) LinkedIn ABM + retargeting (buying-group reach)

• Plan around median CPC ~$3.94, CPM ~$31–$38, CTR ~0.52% and build for ABM efficiency, not scale. (Closely)
  
  

4) Email/CRM (velocity + expansion)

• Under privacy constraints, lifecycle is where you regain control—nurture stakeholders and accelerate assessments/proposals with stage-based sequences. (IAB)
  
  

‍

Content + ad formats to test (highest expected lift)

Test 1: Proof-first vs Process-first

• Proof-first: uptime methodology, SLA response times, utilization snapshots
  
  
• Process-first: deployment timeline, permitting/interconnection plan
  Why: NEVI-level expectations push buyers toward evidence and compliance. (eCFR)
  
  

Test 2: Offer type

• “Site feasibility + ROI model” vs “Incentive eligibility check” vs “Depot load plan”
  Why: These match buyer bottlenecks better than “Book a demo.”
  
  

Test 3: Format

• Document/carousel (forwardable internally) vs short video (fast comprehension) vs interactive calculator (decision-ready numbers).
  
  

‍

Retention and LTV growth strategies (most underused lever)

Commercial EV charging LTV typically grows through multi-site expansion and services attach (O&M, monitoring, upgrades). Marketing’s job is to make expansion easy to justify.

Do this

• Build an “Expansion Nurture Track” triggered by:
  
  
  
  • assessment completed, first site live, utilization milestone, uptime milestone
    
    
• Ship a quarterly “Operations Proof Pack” (internal + external):
  
  
  
  • uptime methodology, outage taxonomy, response times, pricing transparency, case studies aligned to NEVI expectations (eCFR)
    
    
• Score accounts by expansion readiness (site count, utilization, funding/incentive timing) and route to sales.
  
  

3×3 Strategy Matrix (Channel × Tactic × Goal)

11) Forecast & Industry Outlook (Next 12–24 Months)

‍

Expected shifts in ad budgets & channel mix

Budgets will rebalance toward efficiency, not expansion

• Gartner’s CMO Spend Survey shows marketing budgets stabilizing around 7–8% of company revenue, down from peak levels earlier in the decade, with pressure to prove ROI increasing across B2B sectors.
  
  
• In capital-intensive industries (energy, infrastructure, mobility), this pressure is even stronger: growth budgets shift from experimentation to defensible, CFO-friendly channels.
  
  

What this means for Commercial EV Charging

• Paid Search and ABM remain funded, but spend concentrates on:
  
  
  
  • fewer ICPs,
    
    
  • fewer offers,
    
    
  • clearer down-funnel conversion events (meetings, assessments, proposals).
    
    
• SEO, lifecycle, and partner channels gain share because they reduce blended CAC over time.
  
  
• Expect events to be more targeted (invite-only, regional, partner-led) rather than large brand activations.
  
  

‍

Tooling & platform outlook

Martech consolidation accelerates

• CMOs continue to rationalize stacks, favoring:
  
  
  
  • CRM as the system of record,
    
    
  • fewer point solutions,
    
    
  • tighter integrations between ads → CRM → revenue.
    
    
• Tools that cannot prove contribution to pipeline or expansion are most at risk of churn.
  
  

First-party data infrastructure becomes non-optional

• IAB research indicates that privacy and signal loss are now “structural,” not transitional, driving ongoing investment in:
  
  
  
  • first-party identity,
    
    
  • consent management,
    
    
  • server-side tracking,
    
    
  • CRM-centric measurement.
    
    
• For EV charging marketers, this reinforces a shift to account- and stage-based KPIs instead of click- or cookie-based attribution.
  
  

‍

Platform dominance: what changes, what doesn’t

What stays dominant

• Google Search: remains the single most important demand-capture channel for commercial EV charging due to high-intent queries (incentives, cost, permitting, “fleet charging solutions”).
  
  
• LinkedIn: remains the primary paid channel for reaching buying groups in fleets, real estate, utilities, and public sector.
  
  

What evolves

• Organic search becomes more “zero-click”:
  
  
  
  • Buyers consume answers directly in SERPs, LinkedIn feeds, or AI summaries.
    
    
  • Marketing success shifts from traffic volume to being the cited, trusted source.
    
    
• Short-form video normalizes in B2B:
  
  
  
  • Not for storytelling, but for fast proof (uptime dashboards, site walkthroughs, install timelines).
    
    

‍

Breakout trends to watch closely

1) AI-generated outbound & sales-assist (controlled, not autonomous)

• Over the next 12–24 months, AI is most likely to succeed in:
  
  
  
  • account research,
    
    
  • persona-specific message drafts,
    
    
  • content repurposing,
    
    
  • lead scoring and routing.
    
    
• Fully autonomous outbound remains risky in a category where claims must be accurate and auditable (especially around uptime, incentives, and ROI).
  
  

Marketing implication: AI becomes a force multiplier for teams, not a replacement for human review.

‍

2) Zero-click SEO + “proof visibility”

• As clicks decline, the value of content shifts to:
  
  
  
  • being referenced in AI summaries,
    
    
  • appearing in featured snippets,
    
    
  • being shared internally by buyers.
    
    
• For EV charging, proof-oriented content (uptime methodology, compliance explanations, deployment timelines) is more likely to surface than generic thought leadership.
  
  

‍

3) Reliability as a brand, not just an ops metric

• With NEVI and similar programs raising reliability expectations, uptime, response time, and transparency will increasingly function as brand attributes.
  
  
• Marketing teams that can credibly package operational performance will outperform those that rely on aspirational sustainability messaging alone.

‍

Expected Channel ROI Over Time

Innovation Curve for the Sector

12) Appendices & Sources

Full list of sources

Paid media & conversion benchmarks

• WordStream / LocaliQ — Google Ads Benchmarks (2024) (CTR, CPC, CVR, CPL; includes “Industrial & Commercial” category data in the downloadable guide). (WordStream, WordStream)
  
  
• Unbounce — Conversion Benchmark Report (2024) (landing page conversion benchmarks; report landing page + methodology references). (Unbounce, PR Newswire)
  
  

Privacy, measurement & signal loss

• IAB — State of Data 2024 (PDF) (privacy-by-design ecosystem; signal loss; org impacts; AI/ML usage patterns). (IAB)
  
  
• Marketing Dive — IAB State of Data 2024 coverage (summary and interpretation of the report’s key findings). (Marketing Dive, Marketing Dive)
  
  

Regulatory & reliability requirements

• eCFR — 23 CFR §680.116 (NEVI minimum uptime >97% and pricing transparency requirements). (eCFR)
  
  
• Federal Register — NEVI Standards & Requirements final rule (context) (Federal Register)

Budget outlook / macro marketing spend

• Gartner — 2024 CMO Spend Survey press release (marketing budgets at 7.7% of revenue; methodology window). (Gartner)
  
  
• Marketing Dive — coverage of Gartner 2024 findings (adds channel mix / paid media share context). (Marketing Dive)
  
  

Industry operational signals used for “expert commentary” and market texture

• EVgo — Q3 2025 results (Autocharge+ share, account growth, operational/throughput notes). (EVgo)
  
  
• Electrify America — 2024 network stats reporting (sessions and energy delivered; used as directional market activity context). (media.electrifyamerica.com, InsideEVs, EnergyTech)
  
  

Cookie deprecation / platform uncertainty

• IAPP — Google ends third-party cookie phaseout plans (high-quality privacy governance perspective). (IAPP)
  
  
• The Verge — reporting on Google’s decision (clear summary of the shift and context). (The Verge)
  
  

Case-study / sector examples

• Qmerit × ChargePoint partnership case study (PDF) (multi-site fleet charging deployment example; used as a sector campaign/partner motion reference). (Qmerit)
  
  

‍

Additional stats & raw data used in visuals (for transparency)

A) “Expected Channel ROI Over Time” (Relative ROI Index) — illustrative scenario data
These values were intentionally directional (not claimed as audited industry averages) to visualize a common B2B infrastructure pattern: immediate ROI from demand capture vs compounding ROI from owned channels.

B) Innovation curve timeline (sector marketing evolution) — illustrative sequencing
Timeline stages reflect widely observed market shifts driven by reliability expectations and privacy/signal-loss constraints (see NEVI + IAB sources). (eCFR, IAB)

• 2023: Infrastructure build-out
  
  
• 2024: Uptime & reliability focus
  
  
• 2025: Proof-driven marketing
  
  
• 2026: AI-assisted personalization
  
  
• 2027: Zero-click / trust-based discovery

‍

Methodology & limitations

• This report uses secondary research only (public benchmarks, regulatory texts, and company disclosures). No primary survey was fielded.
  
  
• Benchmarks are “closest-fit proxies.” Many public benchmarks are not EV-charging-specific; where the sector lacks direct benchmark datasets, the report uses industrial/commercial or B2B infrastructure proxies (explicitly labeled).
  
  
• Illustrative charts (ROI index, innovation curve sequencing) are included to support planning discussions; they are not presented as audited market averages.
  
  
• Attribution caveat: The privacy-by-design ecosystem and signal loss (IAB) mean last-click and platform-reported ROAS should be treated as directional—hence the emphasis on CRM stage conversions. (IAB)

‍

Disclaimer: The information on this page is provided by Digital.Marketing for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, tax, or professional advice, nor an offer or recommendation to buy or sell any security, instrument, or investment strategy. All content, including statistics, commentary, forecasts, and analyses, is generic in nature, may not be accurate, complete, or current, and should not be relied upon without consulting your own financial, legal, and tax advisers. Investing in financial services, fintech ventures, or related instruments involves significant risks—including market, liquidity, regulatory, business, and technology risks—and may result in the loss of principal. Digital.Marketing does not act as your broker, adviser, or fiduciary unless expressly agreed in writing, and assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or losses arising from use of this content. Any forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and actual outcomes may differ materially. References or links to third-party sites and data are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement or responsibility. Access to this information may be restricted or prohibited in certain jurisdictions, and Digital.Marketing may modify or remove content at any time without notice.

‍

‍