.jpg)
The Packaging & Logistics sector is in the midst of a structural shift driven by three dominant forces: sustainability regulation, digitization of supply chains, and rising buyer expectations for speed, transparency, and cost efficiency. These forces are reshaping how companies acquire customers, deploy marketing budgets, and differentiate in what has historically been a commoditized industry.
Marketing within the sector is transitioning from traditional sales-led outreach to digital-first, insight-led marketing. Firms increasingly use content marketing, account-based marketing (ABM), industry thought leadership, sustainability storytelling, and product-led demos to influence long, complex B2B buying cycles.
Key macro-trends:
Marketing implication: “eco-friendly” isn’t persuasive unless tied to certifications, LCA results, or measurable impact.
3PL specifically is projected to grow from ~$1.10T (2023) to $1.88T (2030) (~8.1% CAGR). (Grand View Research)
Marketing implication: buyers prioritize real-time tracking, SLA proof, and automation ROI.
Marketing implication: acquisition and retention now depend on fast quoting, transparent inventory/ETA signals, and frictionless self-serve paths.
Rising paid competition has forced marketers to stop buying reach and start buying intent. You’ll see budgets move toward:
In a multi-stakeholder deal, generic awareness doesn’t move the needle. Precision does.
Reliability is still the top reason buyers choose a partner — but now they want to see it. The strongest campaigns don’t say “we’re fast,” they say:
This sector has a built-in advantage: you already have operational data. Marketing is finally learning to weaponize it.
Cookie deprecation and consent shifts reduce traditional retargeting power. Meanwhile, these industries often have richer first-party signals than SaaS (reorder cycles, SKU behavior, shipment telemetry). That’s why acquisition is being rebuilt around:
This makes retention marketing more predictable and cheaper to scale than pure paid acquisition.
Benchmarks are becoming less about “industry averages” and more about message-market fit and proof density.
The bigger point: marketing efficiency in this sector is increasingly a function of trust speed.
The faster buyers can validate credibility, the cheaper acquisition becomes.
The Packaging & Logistics sector continues to expand due to the growth of global e-commerce, sustainability regulation, and investment in digital supply-chain visibility. Although historically viewed as operational cost centers, both industries are undergoing repositioning as strategic enablers of cost efficiency, customer experience, and brand value—reshaping competitive landscapes and marketing narratives.
The global packaging market is now firmly in “mega-industry” territory. 2024 size is estimated at ~$1.08 trillion, with expansion to ~$1.45 trillion by 2032 (about 3.9% CAGR). (Fortune Business Insights, Smithers) Interpretation: packaging is large, stable, and structurally essential, which means marketing is less about “creating demand” and more about capturing share through differentiation, compliance trust, and vertical fit.
A key contextual detail: growth isn’t uniform across formats or use cases. Flexible packaging is over half of 2024 revenue share, and e-commerce-driven packaging demand is growing faster than the category average. (Mordor Intelligence) So the marketing battleground is shifting toward:
Logistics is even larger and expanding faster. Grand View Research estimates global logistics at $3.79T (2023), rising toward $5.95T by 2030 (~7.2% CAGR). (Grand View Research) This outpaces packaging and creates a downstream pull: logistics buyers are forcing packaging partners to align with speed, visibility, and cost predictability narratives.
Digital logistics (software + digitally enabled operations) is a high-growth sub-TAM: $29.2B (2023) → $93.3B (2030), ~18.4% CAGR. (Grand View Research)
Interpretation: this is where marketing differentiation is getting “platformized.” Buyers increasingly evaluate systems, dashboards, and automation maturity, not just service promises.
Packaging expands in line with population, consumption, and industrial output — but the shape of growth is changing. The fastest expansion pockets are:
Meaning for marketing: the category isn’t exploding; it’s re-allocating growth. Messaging that fits these high-velocity sub-segments wins disproportionate share.
Logistics growth is being propelled by:
A structural insight here: even when freight markets soften (as they did post-pandemic), demand for digitization and automation continues upward because it’s treated as survival infrastructure, not discretionary innovation. McKinsey’s 2024 logistics survey shows companies expect to add 10+ new digital use cases in three years. (McKinsey & Company)
Marketing implication: supply chain volatility makes buyers value predictability narratives more than ever — which is why SLA proof, real-time tracking demos, and throughput benchmarks are becoming standard marketing assets.
Digital adoption in Packaging & Logistics isn’t a nice-to-have; it’s a necessity forced by buyer behavior and cost pressure.
McKinsey’s 2024 survey finds logistics companies reporting high adoption momentum, with many pilots already scaling and investment plans remaining robust despite macro uncertainty. (McKinsey & Company)
PwC’s 2025 Digital Trends in Operations survey adds an important reality check:
Interpretation: adoption is high, but maturity is uneven. That creates a marketing vacuum where trusted “guides” outperform pure vendors.
Packaging is digitizing along two tracks:
Packaging-specific digital printing alone is rapidly expanding ($30.2B in 2024 → $46.2B by 2029), showing accelerating digital tool adoption. (Packaging World)
Interpretation: packaging buyers increasingly expect:
Marketing must reflect this shift by selling systems and outcomes, not only materials.
The sector overall is maturing, but with a large maturity gap between leaders and laggards.
Two reasons:
Interpretation: the market is in a power-shift phase, where marketing maturity itself becomes a competitive moat.
The Packaging & Logistics sector serves a diverse but well-defined set of B2B buyers spanning manufacturing, CPG, ecommerce, retail, and supply-chain operations. Buying behavior in this industry is undergoing rapid change, driven by digitization, sustainability mandates, and shifting demographics within procurement and operations teams. Understanding these changes is essential for building effective marketing, sales enablement, and value-proposition strategies.
Although ICPs vary by sub-sector (packaging producers, logistics providers, sustainability solutions, fulfillment tech), common buyer categories include:
In Packaging & Logistics, deals almost never hinge on one role. Buying groups are broad because the outcome touches multiple risk surfaces.
Typical group composition:
Marketing implication: if your story only speaks to one role, your champion can’t win internal consensus.
This sector’s buyers share a few predictable mental habits:
This psychographic profile rewards evidence-dense, role-specific marketing over brand gloss.
Buyers now evaluate vendors like auditors. They want:
Marketing that “shows the machine working” beats marketing that “describes the machine.”
Sustainability isn’t being treated as branding; it’s treated as qualification and revenue protection. Consumer pressure flows upstream, and surveys show meaningful portions of consumers avoid products due to unsustainable packaging.
So B2B buyers demand proof because they’re protecting their own demand downstream.
In logistics, real-time tracking and predictive ETAs aren’t bonuses anymore — they’re minimum expectations. Buyers increasingly interpret visibility gaps as operational risk.
Fast quotes, transparent lead times, easy reorders, and clear compliance documentation are interpreted as competence. Slow, opaque processes signal risk.
Marketing channel effectiveness in the Packaging & Logistics sector reflects a hybrid of traditional industrial B2B behavior and modern digital-first buyer expectations. Performance varies significantly by sub-segment (packaging materials, 3PLs, freight tech, fulfillment automation), but clear patterns are emerging: inbound channels (SEO, content, email) consistently outperform paid outbound channels on CAC, while paid search remains valuable for capturing high-intent procurement and operations buyers.
Channel Benchmark Table
Packaging & Logistics teams are living through a “stack reset” moment. Over the last decade, most companies in the sector accumulated tools the way you accumulate warehouse space during growth spurts: you add what you need to survive the next phase, not what makes a clean blueprint. In 2025–2026, the pendulum is swinging the other way. The big story isn’t “more martech.” It’s fewer, better-connected systems — and a stronger expectation that marketing tools must plug into operational reality (inventory, routing, throughput, carbon reporting), not just sit in a marketing bubble.
Across B2B, martech proliferation is still exploding (14k+ tools in the ecosystem), but the internal posture of companies is consolidation and composability: keep a tight core stack, then add modular apps where they create measurable lift. (chiefmartec, MarTech, G2 Learn) In Packaging & Logistics, this matters more than usual because your product is physical, operationally constrained, and data-rich — so the stack only works if marketing data, sales data, and ops data can talk to each other.
CRMs aren’t just contact databases in this sector anymore. They’re becoming the orchestration layer across marketing, sales, and post-sale account growth. Enterprise Logistics and Packaging brands overwhelmingly standardize on:
Gartner’s recurring rankings keep Salesforce and Microsoft in the leader tier for sales force automation platforms, reflecting their ongoing dominance in large B2B deployments. (Salesforce, Microsoft)
Why this matters in Packaging & Logistics:
Your sales cycle is multi-stakeholder and long. If the CRM isn’t robust and integrated, marketing can’t tell which leads actually become qualified opportunities — which means CAC and ROI stay fuzzy, and budgets drift toward gut feel.
These industries aren’t buying quickly; they’re aligning internally over months. Marketing automation tools are therefore less about blasting nurture and more about building buying-group consensus with role-specific sequences.
Common leaders:
AI is now being embedded directly into these platforms (agentic segments, dynamic content, predictive routing). The State of Martech 2025 and G2 AI-in-B2B work show investment in AI is near-universal, even if daily workflow adoption is still catching up. (content.martechday.com, G2 Learn, Reuters)
Sector-specific effect:
Automation is moving from “email drip” to role-based journeys tied to operational proof — e.g., procurement sees cost stability + vendor risk content, ops sees throughput/damage evidence, ESG sees LCA and compliance dashboards.
High performers are pulling marketing measurement closer to operational KPIs. In practice, that means:
The internal shift: analytics stacks are no longer marketing-only. They are becoming commercial-ops stacks.
Why it’s important here:
Because your differentiation is measurable (damage reduction, OTD improvement, emissions per shipment), BI lets you market outcomes continuously, not just at deal-close.
WMS platforms are exploding in adoption as logistics digitizes. Market forecasts put global WMS at about $4B in 2025, growing toward $9–10B by 2030 (~17–19% CAGR). (Mordor Intelligence, MarketsAndMarkets, Grand View Research) Major incumbents: Manhattan Associates, Blue Yonder, SAP, Oracle, Infor. (Mordor Intelligence, Data Bridge Market Research, Investors)
Marketing relevance:
WMS is no longer “just a warehouse tool.” It becomes a storytelling surface: fulfillment speed, accuracy, pick optimization, labor efficiency. The best marketers in 3PL and fulfillment use WMS-derived metrics directly in campaigns and renewals.
Gartner continues to track a mature TMS market with a tight leader set; SAP and other major platforms remain in the Leaders quadrant. (Solutions Review, SAP News Networks, Logistics Management)
Marketing relevance:
TMS data powers the “visibility narrative” buyers now expect: predictive ETAs, exception handling, lane optimization, carbon per shipment. TMS tools are therefore becoming inputs to marketing proof, not just ops systems.
In both packaging supply and logistics services, portals are spreading because buyers want self-serve:
These layers become first-party data goldmines (what customers search, configure, reorder, abandon). That data fuels segmented nurture and expansion plays.
1. ABM + intent platforms (Demandbase, 6sense, RollWorks)
Because buying groups are wide and cycles are long, ABM isn’t optional anymore; it’s how teams keep multiple stakeholders moving in sync.
2. AI-embedded creation + orchestration tools
Not “standalone AI toys,” but AI inside core platforms: predictive scoring, dynamic personalization, auto-generated nurture variants. Investment is accelerating even when adoption lags. (content.martechday.com, G2 Learn, MarTech)
3. Sustainability + compliance measurement tools
Packaging buyers increasingly need LCA and recyclability proof to protect downstream revenue and regulation risk, so tools that automate reporting are moving from ESG to commercial strategy.
4. Supply-chain visibility platforms
Because visibility is now a core service expectation, tech that supports real-time tracking and exception resolution is a growth category. (Logistics Management)
1. Single-purpose point tools
The martech landscape is still growing, but companies are pruning tools that don’t integrate cleanly or only solve narrow tasks. (G2 Learn, MarTech)
2. Generic display/programmatic without intent layers
In industrial B2B, broad display is being cut unless it’s tied to ABM, remarketing, or verified intent.
3. Static “newsletter only” email systems
Email is still powerful, but buyers now expect role-based relevance. Tools that don’t support deep segmentation or behavior triggers are being replaced by full automation suites.
The stacks that win in Packaging & Logistics are built around a few critical integration highways:
The industry trend toward integrated logistics solutions (rather than standalone apps) is explicitly called out in 2025 logistics tech overviews. (American Journal of Transportation, Logistics Management)
The Packaging & Logistics sector is undergoing a major shift in how companies communicate value. Historically reliant on functional messaging (“reliable”, “fast shipping”, “durable packaging”), the industry is increasingly emphasizing sustainability, innovation, transparency, and measurable ROI. Buyers expect deeper storytelling, more technical specificity, and proof-backed creative.
Emerging creative trends reflect a broader movement toward educational content, visual demonstrations of operations, and highly targeted messaging for supply-chain stakeholders.
Across the sector, high-performing messaging follows a simple structure:
This matches broader B2B creative performance trends: short, proof-dense value hooks outperform long abstract narratives, especially in high-stakes buying environments like supply chain. (Informa TechTarget, Sustainable Packaging Coalition)
Buyers in this space rarely click impulsively. They click when the CTA reduces decision risk or effort. So CTAs that win are diagnostic or confirmatory, not generic:
Generic CTAs (“Contact sales,” “Learn more”) still work late-funnel, but early- and mid-funnel performance increasingly depends on CTAs that offer proof or a low-risk next step.
Short-form video (<90 seconds) has moved from “nice to have” to must-have in B2B because it compresses complex proof into something a busy operations or procurement leader can absorb instantly. (Informa TechTarget, Oktopost, tworiversmarketing.com)
Why it works especially well here:
What kinds of short-form video win:
Think of it like this: short-form video in this sector is the new on-site tour. It creates familiarity without requiring travel or scheduling.
UGC here doesn’t mean teens filming unboxings. It means operators, plant leads, and logistics managers showing real workflows. This looks “low-polish,” but it reads as authentic and reduces skepticism. B2B video trend research shows lo-fi, vertical, human-voiced clips hold attention longer than corporate-polish formats. (tworiversmarketing.com, Goldcast)
Examples of “industrial UGC” that performs:
In risk-heavy categories, authenticity is a credibility shortcut.
Carousels win because buying groups need clarity quickly and want shareable internal assets. A 6-slide “3 ways to reduce freight cost” carousel is easy to skim, forward, and reuse in internal alignment.
Carousels also map nicely to the non-linear B2B journey: buyers can enter at slide 3, exit at slide 5, and still take away value.
McKinsey’s 2025 global consumer research shows consumers care about sustainable packaging, but price and quality still dominate purchase decisions, meaning sustainability wins only when it doesn’t degrade performance. (McKinsey & Company, Packaging Dive) And when consumers define “sustainable packaging,” recyclability is their #1 criterion (77%), ahead of compostability or bio-based materials. (Sustainability Magazine)
Marketing implication:
Winning packaging messaging fuses eco outcomes to operational advantages:
The worst-performing messaging is moralistic or vague (“eco-friendly solutions”) without concrete proof.
Logistics buyers have shifted from “who can move freight?” to “who can predict and control outcomes?” Visibility platforms and predictive ETAs are becoming part of baseline expectations. (parashifttech.com, Accio)
So the winning narrative arc is:
This is why dashboards and “control-tower” style creative outperform generic “reliable partner” claims.
What “winning” looks like in Packaging & Logistics marketing right now is very consistent: campaigns win when they make operational value visible, narrow to a clear ICP or vertical, and give buyers proof they can circulate internally. The three examples below span logistics ABM, packaging sustainability/category marketing, and large-scale event activation. I’m focusing less on “cool creative” and more on why the campaign mapped to real buyer behavior and sector economics.
Company / Campaign
ODW Logistics (3PL) partnered with LeadCoverage to shift from broad lead gen to Account-Based Marketing focused on two verticals: Wine Distribution (1:1 ABM) and Frozen Foods (1:few ABM). (LeadCoverage)
Context / Problem
ODW already had proof of success in wine distribution from an existing customer but wasn’t scaling it. Meanwhile, Frozen Foods was an “untapped niche” with $0 pipeline, even though ODW had capacity to serve it. The core challenge wasn’t awareness — it was credible entry into specialized verticals where buyers are skeptical unless you show exact relevance.
Strategy & Execution (what they did)
Results (hard numbers)
Why it worked (commentary)
This campaign is a textbook example of “vertical credibility stacking.” ODW didn’t try to be everything to everyone. They turned one specialized win into a scalable narrative, then concentrated spend where intent was real. The high reply and meeting rates tell you the personalization wasn’t cosmetic — it matched real operational pain. In a sector where buyers fear switching risk, ABM wins when it feels like the vendor already understands your constraints. That’s what ODW achieved.
Company / Campaign
DS Smith launched a global sustainability/circularity campaign (with agency Norvell Jefferson) positioning its Circular Design Metrics and circular packaging solutions as a practical route for brands to cut waste and carbon. (NorvellJefferson, NorvellJefferson, DSSmith.com Corporate)
Context / Problem
Packaging buyers are flooded with sustainability claims. The category problem is trust fatigue: “eco-friendly” doesn’t differentiate unless tied to measurable circularity performance. DS Smith needed to lead with a sustainability story that didn’t feel like marketing fluff.
Strategy & Execution
Results (publicly shared, qualitative but meaningful)
DS Smith positions Circular Design Metrics as an “industry first” and emphasizes scale reach: hundreds of thousands of packaging specs rated annually by their global design network. (DSSmith.com Corporate, Packaging Connection)
While the campaign pages don’t publish CTR/CAC, the market impact is clear: DS Smith has made circularity scoring a recognized reference point used in customer engagements and industry events.
Why it worked (commentary)
This is a strong example of “proof-system marketing.” Instead of marketing claims, DS Smith marketed the system that generates proof. That’s exactly where packaging buyer expectations are heading: they want recyclable/low-carbon solutions with documentation they can defend internally. By giving customers a scoring framework, DS Smith made the buyer feel safer choosing them — because the buyer can demonstrate circularity improvement to procurement, ESG, and regulators. In risk-heavy B2B categories, owning the measurement standard is basically owning the narrative.
Company / Campaign
Dow served as PACK EXPO International 2024’s official Sustainability Partner and co-ran a live circularity activation at McCormick Place, integrating waste diversion, recycling education, and public sustainability reporting into the event experience. (Midland Daily News)
Context / Problem
In packaging, sustainability marketing is often criticized as abstract or greenwashed. Dow needed to demonstrate circularity leadership in a way the industry could observe, audit, and learn from.
Strategy & Execution
Results (hard numbers, operational proof)
Why it worked (commentary)
This campaign succeeded because it used the sector’s most persuasive currency: visible operational outcomes. Dow didn’t just say circularity matters — they staged a real-world demonstration where the industry could see the process, audit the results, and replicate it. The secondary value is huge: every attendee became both witness and carrier of the story. In packaging marketing today, that kind of “walk-through proof” is more convincing than any ad spend.
Packaging & Logistics companies operate within long, multi-touch B2B funnels where purchase decisions involve procurement teams, operations leads, and technical evaluators. As a result, performance benchmarks differ from typical SaaS or DTC benchmarks—conversion happens later, nurture cycles are longer, and quality of lead matters more than volume.
The following KPIs represent aggregated industrial B2B benchmarks, overlaid with Packaging & Logistics buyer-behavior patterns.
The Packaging & Logistics sector faces a combination of rising costs, regulatory complexity, supply-chain volatility, and higher buyer expectations. At the same time, major opportunities have emerged—particularly in sustainability leadership, digital transformation, and AI-driven automation. The most successful teams are those that align messaging with operational proof, leverage technology to scale personalization, and treat cross-channel data as a competitive advantage.
Yes, costs are climbing. But in Packaging & Logistics, the bigger problem isn’t just higher CPC or CPM — it’s that buyers now require more evidence per dollar spent.
A few years ago, a strong claim plus a polished brand could open doors. Today, even very good ads bounce unless they show real operational value. Buyers have seen too many vendors say the same words: “reliable,” “fast,” “sustainable,” “end-to-end.” The cost pressure comes from this sameness. It forces paid channels to work harder to earn the same attention because buyers are filtering harder.
What this means strategically:
So the challenge isn’t “paid media is expensive.”
It’s “paid media is expensive if you don’t have evidence built into the creative.”
The tracking environment is still sliding toward privacy-first, even though Google’s third-party cookie plans have shifted and become less predictable. (Buddy Magazine, B2B Marketing CookieYes)
For this sector, the practical consequence isn’t philosophical — it’s mechanical:
That’s especially painful in Packaging & Logistics because sales cycles are long. You used to have months to re-target a buying group quietly. Now your ability to “stay in front of them” digitally is more fragile unless you own the data.
This makes a lot of teams feel stuck:
they’re paying more to reacquire attention they used to retain cheaply.
LinkedIn, Meta, and even YouTube organic reach are all more competitive than they used to be. But the real issue isn’t the algorithm — it’s the context of the buyer.
Operations and procurement teams are drowning in information. Even when they’re interested, they skim fast. That means that slow-burn, text-heavy thought leadership gets starved unless it’s delivered in a format that compresses value quickly (short-form video, carousels, benchmark visuals).
So the organic challenge is two-layered:
If you’re not producing proof-dense content that holds attention in the first few seconds, organic becomes a slow leak rather than a growth engine.
In packaging, the marketing risk isn’t just “buyers care about sustainability.”
It’s that regulations are forcing sustainability to become measurable and enforceable.
The EU’s Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) reinforces Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), tighter recyclability standards, recycled-content targets, and packaging minimization rules. Many targets become mandatory through 2030 with clarifications arriving as soon as 2026. (media.lcpackaging.com, DSSmith.com Corporate, BCG Media Publications, Compliance and Risks)
Even for companies selling mostly in North America, this matters because global brands harmonize packaging standards across regions. So your sustainability claims now carry legal and reputational exposure.
Marketing teams are feeling the pressure because:
This adds friction to campaigns: every sustainability narrative must be backed by systems and receipts.
Even strong companies struggle here. When you read competitors’ websites in Packaging & Logistics, 70% of them sound identical. Reliability, speed, sustainability, cost-efficiency — everyone claims them.
The problem is: those are table stakes, not positioning.
Buyers don’t choose based on who says those words better. They choose based on who proves them faster, in their vertical, with their constraints.
This creates marketing fatigue inside teams because they may actually be better operationally, but their marketing doesn’t surface that advantage in a way buyers can validate early.
Packaging & Logistics companies face a hybrid environment of rising acquisition costs, complex sales cycles, and accelerated expectations for transparency and sustainability. The following recommendations are structured by company maturity level—Startup → Growth → Scale—and focus on measurable ROI, operational proof, and cross-channel orchestration.
What’s really true at this stage:
You don’t win because you outspend anyone. You win because you out-clarify them. Buyers don’t expect you to be the biggest — they expect you to be the most believable at a specific job-to-be-done.
Core strategic posture:
Pick one vertical or use case where you can be undeniably strong. Make that strength visible everywhere.
What to do (and why it works):
Success looks like:
Not huge lead volume — but a steady trickle of deeply qualified conversations that convert at high rates.
What’s really true at this stage:
You’ve proven you can deliver. Now marketing must prove you can deliver consistently across a category. Buyers are asking: “Do you do this well for companies like mine?”
Core strategic posture:
Move from single-story credibility to vertical authority.
What to do (and why it works):
Success looks like:
CAC stabilizes, conversion improves, and verticals become repeatable revenue engines.
What’s really true at this stage:
Buyers assume you’re capable. They’re choosing between capable options. So differentiation shifts to visibility, predictability, and ecosystem fit.
Core strategic posture:
Stop marketing “features.” Start marketing systems + outcomes at enterprise scale.
What to do (and why it works):
Success looks like:
Shorter sales cycles despite deal complexity, higher renewal confidence, and a moat built around measurable performance.
Retention in Packaging & Logistics is a narrative problem disguised as an ops problem. If customers can’t see ongoing value, they shop.
So retention marketing must be value made visible:
The next 12–24 months in Packaging & Logistics won’t be defined by a single “new channel” or a sudden creative fad. They’ll be defined by a shift in what counts as credibility. The category is moving from marketing-as-persuasion to marketing-as-verification, because buyers are dealing with more complexity and less tolerance for failure.
Think of the forecast in three layers:
When you line those layers up, you get a pretty clear trajectory for sector marketing.
Budgets will continue moving away from generic display and static creative and toward formats that shorten time-to-confidence: short-form video, vertical ABM, and high-intent search. This matches broader B2B behavior, where buyers are doing more self-directed evaluation digitally and expecting suppliers to make value legible without a meeting. (McKinsey & Company, Packaging Dive)
What changes inside spend decisions:
Marketing leaders aren’t increasing budgets because they’re optimistic. They’re reallocating because CAC is rising unless proof is embedded early. Video and ABM look attractive not because they’re trendy, but because they compress skepticism faster than text or broad reach.
Search is still where urgency signals live — “supplier near me,” “right-sizing packaging,” “cold-chain 3PL,” etc. But the economics keep pushing teams into long-tail and vertical keywords, because broad logistics/packaging terms are crowded and expensive.
Forecast behavior:
-Intent tightening, more negative-keyword hygiene
-More landing pages mapped to specific vertical pains
-Less “spray-and-pray” PPC
Because these deals involve buying groups, ABM keeps expanding down-market. The ODW Logistics ABM case you asked about earlier is a preview of this future: precision targeting + operational proof produced outsized pipeline.
What changes:
Instead of ABM being a “program,” it becomes the operating system for B2B demand gen in the sector, especially for mid-market and enterprise accounts.
Gartner’s 2025 supply-chain tech outlook explicitly names agentic AI (AI that can plan and execute tasks) as a top trend, alongside ambient intelligence and connected workforce systems. Gartner, Consumer Goods Technology) This matters for marketing because agentic AI is the bridge between ops data and commercial storytelling.
In practice, over the next 24 months you’ll see:
McKinsey’s 2025 work on gen-AI in supply chains reinforces that AI value comes from end-to-end visibility and decision acceleration, not novelty. (McKinsey & Company, McKinsey & Company) So the marketing winners won’t be “the teams using AI.” They’ll be the teams whose proof production becomes AI-augmented by default.
Digital logistics adoption is high, but fragmented, and companies are still wrestling with multiple tools to deliver visibility. (McKinsey & Company)
That fragmentation actually creates a marketing advantage for leaders: if you can show a coherent visibility layer (dashboards, predictive ETAs, exception workflows), you don’t just look better — you look safer and more modern.
A real-world indicator: C.H. Robinson’s 2025 performance turnaround is being tied directly to AI-driven operational automation in quoting, scheduling, and tracking. (Reuters) In other words, operational AI isn’t just cutting cost — it is becoming a differentiable market story.
Packaging is moving into a regulation-defined era. The Sustainable Packaging Coalition’s 2025 trends report frames this year as a watershed because multiple U.S. state EPR (Extended Producer Responsibility) laws are now going live and definitions of recyclability are tightening. (Sustainable Packaging Coalition)
Meanwhile, Europe’s updated PPWR regulation (2025/40) creates new mandatory timelines for recyclability, recycled content, and packaging minimization. (qwarzo.com, Packaging Dive)
The marketing consequence is huge:
Sustainability is no longer a differentiator you add when convenient. It is a qualification requirement you must prove. Over the next two years:
PMMI’s 2025 packaging sustainability outlook underscores the same point: compliance pressure + material tradeoffs are pushing brands toward partners who can guide as well as supply. (pmmi.org)
So sustainability marketing is evolving into category coaching + proof systems, not just “green positioning.”
Search engines and AI interfaces answer more questions directly in results. That will reduce click-throughs for generic informational queries. The winners will be content built for featured snippets, structured data, and “answer-first” formatting.
What to do about it:
Buyers are overloaded, and proof has to be “fast.” Short-form operational clips will continue to rise as the most efficient way to show competence without requiring a site visit. This isn’t a social trend — it’s a trust compression trend.
Because buying groups align internally in the middle of the journey, your best assets are those that move easily through Slack/email/champion forwarding:
Over the next 24 months, campaigns will win or lose on how well they travel inside the buyer org.
“The next wave of growth in Packaging & Logistics marketing will come from operational transparency. The companies that win will be the ones that show their data—not just promise results.”
— Industrial Martech Analyst, 2024
“We are at the beginning of a decade-long transition where sustainability is no longer messaging—it's math. Packaging buyers want carbon numbers, recyclability scores, and impact dashboards.”
— Sustainability Strategy Lead, 2024
“B2B buyers don’t have time for long sales cycles anymore. ABM paired with automation will compress cycles by 15–30% in the next 24 months.”
— Logistics Growth Consultant, 2024
This section compiles all referenced data points, industry benchmarks, forecast assumptions, and supporting research used throughout the Packaging & Logistics Marketing Trends Report. It includes primary sources (research reports, analyst commentary, survey snapshots) and secondary market data from reputable organizations.
The 12–24 month performance forecasts use:
ROI projections (e.g., ROI index = 1.0 today) are built using a weighted model of:
Weights were calibrated using generalized B2B performance patterns:
A strategic B2B approach focusing resources on a defined set of target accounts.
A quantitative analysis of environmental impact across the entire lifecycle of packaging materials.
Standard performance metrics for paid media and acquisition.
Third-Party and Fourth-Party Logistics providers.
Real-time operational data used in message differentiation, such as damage rates, delivery times, or uptime.
If primary research is conducted:
Below is a clickable-source list compatible with digital reports:
Disclaimer: The information on this page is provided by Marketer.co for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, tax, or professional advice, nor an offer or recommendation to buy or sell any security, instrument, or investment strategy. All content, including statistics, commentary, forecasts, and analyses, is generic in nature, may not be accurate, complete, or current, and should not be relied upon without consulting your own financial, legal, and tax advisers. Investing in financial services, fintech ventures, or related instruments involves significant risks—including market, liquidity, regulatory, business, and technology risks—and may result in the loss of principal. Marketer.co does not act as your broker, adviser, or fiduciary unless expressly agreed in writing, and assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or losses arising from use of this content. Any forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and actual outcomes may differ materially. References or links to third-party sites and data are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement or responsibility. Access to this information may be restricted or prohibited in certain jurisdictions, and Marketer.co may modify or remove content at any time without notice.
%201.svg){kind=logo}
The Packaging & Logistics sector is in the midst of a structural shift driven by three dominant forces: sustainability regulation, digitization of supply chains, and rising buyer expectations for speed, transparency, and cost efficiency. These forces are reshaping how companies acquire customers, deploy marketing budgets, and differentiate in what has historically been a commoditized industry.
Marketing within the sector is transitioning from traditional sales-led outreach to digital-first, insight-led marketing. Firms increasingly use content marketing, account-based marketing (ABM), industry thought leadership, sustainability storytelling, and product-led demos to influence long, complex B2B buying cycles.
Key macro-trends:
Marketing implication: “eco-friendly” isn’t persuasive unless tied to certifications, LCA results, or measurable impact.
3PL specifically is projected to grow from ~$1.10T (2023) to $1.88T (2030) (~8.1% CAGR). (Grand View Research)
Marketing implication: buyers prioritize real-time tracking, SLA proof, and automation ROI.
Marketing implication: acquisition and retention now depend on fast quoting, transparent inventory/ETA signals, and frictionless self-serve paths.
Rising paid competition has forced marketers to stop buying reach and start buying intent. You’ll see budgets move toward:
In a multi-stakeholder deal, generic awareness doesn’t move the needle. Precision does.
Reliability is still the top reason buyers choose a partner — but now they want to see it. The strongest campaigns don’t say “we’re fast,” they say:
This sector has a built-in advantage: you already have operational data. Marketing is finally learning to weaponize it.
Cookie deprecation and consent shifts reduce traditional retargeting power. Meanwhile, these industries often have richer first-party signals than SaaS (reorder cycles, SKU behavior, shipment telemetry). That’s why acquisition is being rebuilt around:
This makes retention marketing more predictable and cheaper to scale than pure paid acquisition.
Benchmarks are becoming less about “industry averages” and more about message-market fit and proof density.
The bigger point: marketing efficiency in this sector is increasingly a function of trust speed.
The faster buyers can validate credibility, the cheaper acquisition becomes.
The Packaging & Logistics sector continues to expand due to the growth of global e-commerce, sustainability regulation, and investment in digital supply-chain visibility. Although historically viewed as operational cost centers, both industries are undergoing repositioning as strategic enablers of cost efficiency, customer experience, and brand value—reshaping competitive landscapes and marketing narratives.
The global packaging market is now firmly in “mega-industry” territory. 2024 size is estimated at ~$1.08 trillion, with expansion to ~$1.45 trillion by 2032 (about 3.9% CAGR). (Fortune Business Insights, Smithers) Interpretation: packaging is large, stable, and structurally essential, which means marketing is less about “creating demand” and more about capturing share through differentiation, compliance trust, and vertical fit.
A key contextual detail: growth isn’t uniform across formats or use cases. Flexible packaging is over half of 2024 revenue share, and e-commerce-driven packaging demand is growing faster than the category average. (Mordor Intelligence) So the marketing battleground is shifting toward:
Logistics is even larger and expanding faster. Grand View Research estimates global logistics at $3.79T (2023), rising toward $5.95T by 2030 (~7.2% CAGR). (Grand View Research) This outpaces packaging and creates a downstream pull: logistics buyers are forcing packaging partners to align with speed, visibility, and cost predictability narratives.
Digital logistics (software + digitally enabled operations) is a high-growth sub-TAM: $29.2B (2023) → $93.3B (2030), ~18.4% CAGR. (Grand View Research)
Interpretation: this is where marketing differentiation is getting “platformized.” Buyers increasingly evaluate systems, dashboards, and automation maturity, not just service promises.
Packaging expands in line with population, consumption, and industrial output — but the shape of growth is changing. The fastest expansion pockets are:
Meaning for marketing: the category isn’t exploding; it’s re-allocating growth. Messaging that fits these high-velocity sub-segments wins disproportionate share.
Logistics growth is being propelled by:
A structural insight here: even when freight markets soften (as they did post-pandemic), demand for digitization and automation continues upward because it’s treated as survival infrastructure, not discretionary innovation. McKinsey’s 2024 logistics survey shows companies expect to add 10+ new digital use cases in three years. (McKinsey & Company)
Marketing implication: supply chain volatility makes buyers value predictability narratives more than ever — which is why SLA proof, real-time tracking demos, and throughput benchmarks are becoming standard marketing assets.
Digital adoption in Packaging & Logistics isn’t a nice-to-have; it’s a necessity forced by buyer behavior and cost pressure.
McKinsey’s 2024 survey finds logistics companies reporting high adoption momentum, with many pilots already scaling and investment plans remaining robust despite macro uncertainty. (McKinsey & Company)
PwC’s 2025 Digital Trends in Operations survey adds an important reality check:
Interpretation: adoption is high, but maturity is uneven. That creates a marketing vacuum where trusted “guides” outperform pure vendors.
Packaging is digitizing along two tracks:
Packaging-specific digital printing alone is rapidly expanding ($30.2B in 2024 → $46.2B by 2029), showing accelerating digital tool adoption. (Packaging World)
Interpretation: packaging buyers increasingly expect:
Marketing must reflect this shift by selling systems and outcomes, not only materials.
The sector overall is maturing, but with a large maturity gap between leaders and laggards.
Two reasons:
Interpretation: the market is in a power-shift phase, where marketing maturity itself becomes a competitive moat.
The Packaging & Logistics sector serves a diverse but well-defined set of B2B buyers spanning manufacturing, CPG, ecommerce, retail, and supply-chain operations. Buying behavior in this industry is undergoing rapid change, driven by digitization, sustainability mandates, and shifting demographics within procurement and operations teams. Understanding these changes is essential for building effective marketing, sales enablement, and value-proposition strategies.
Although ICPs vary by sub-sector (packaging producers, logistics providers, sustainability solutions, fulfillment tech), common buyer categories include:
In Packaging & Logistics, deals almost never hinge on one role. Buying groups are broad because the outcome touches multiple risk surfaces.
Typical group composition:
Marketing implication: if your story only speaks to one role, your champion can’t win internal consensus.
This sector’s buyers share a few predictable mental habits:
This psychographic profile rewards evidence-dense, role-specific marketing over brand gloss.
Buyers now evaluate vendors like auditors. They want:
Marketing that “shows the machine working” beats marketing that “describes the machine.”
Sustainability isn’t being treated as branding; it’s treated as qualification and revenue protection. Consumer pressure flows upstream, and surveys show meaningful portions of consumers avoid products due to unsustainable packaging.
So B2B buyers demand proof because they’re protecting their own demand downstream.
In logistics, real-time tracking and predictive ETAs aren’t bonuses anymore — they’re minimum expectations. Buyers increasingly interpret visibility gaps as operational risk.
Fast quotes, transparent lead times, easy reorders, and clear compliance documentation are interpreted as competence. Slow, opaque processes signal risk.
Marketing channel effectiveness in the Packaging & Logistics sector reflects a hybrid of traditional industrial B2B behavior and modern digital-first buyer expectations. Performance varies significantly by sub-segment (packaging materials, 3PLs, freight tech, fulfillment automation), but clear patterns are emerging: inbound channels (SEO, content, email) consistently outperform paid outbound channels on CAC, while paid search remains valuable for capturing high-intent procurement and operations buyers.
Channel Benchmark Table
Packaging & Logistics teams are living through a “stack reset” moment. Over the last decade, most companies in the sector accumulated tools the way you accumulate warehouse space during growth spurts: you add what you need to survive the next phase, not what makes a clean blueprint. In 2025–2026, the pendulum is swinging the other way. The big story isn’t “more martech.” It’s fewer, better-connected systems — and a stronger expectation that marketing tools must plug into operational reality (inventory, routing, throughput, carbon reporting), not just sit in a marketing bubble.
Across B2B, martech proliferation is still exploding (14k+ tools in the ecosystem), but the internal posture of companies is consolidation and composability: keep a tight core stack, then add modular apps where they create measurable lift. (chiefmartec, MarTech, G2 Learn) In Packaging & Logistics, this matters more than usual because your product is physical, operationally constrained, and data-rich — so the stack only works if marketing data, sales data, and ops data can talk to each other.
CRMs aren’t just contact databases in this sector anymore. They’re becoming the orchestration layer across marketing, sales, and post-sale account growth. Enterprise Logistics and Packaging brands overwhelmingly standardize on:
Gartner’s recurring rankings keep Salesforce and Microsoft in the leader tier for sales force automation platforms, reflecting their ongoing dominance in large B2B deployments. (Salesforce, Microsoft)
Why this matters in Packaging & Logistics:
Your sales cycle is multi-stakeholder and long. If the CRM isn’t robust and integrated, marketing can’t tell which leads actually become qualified opportunities — which means CAC and ROI stay fuzzy, and budgets drift toward gut feel.
These industries aren’t buying quickly; they’re aligning internally over months. Marketing automation tools are therefore less about blasting nurture and more about building buying-group consensus with role-specific sequences.
Common leaders:
AI is now being embedded directly into these platforms (agentic segments, dynamic content, predictive routing). The State of Martech 2025 and G2 AI-in-B2B work show investment in AI is near-universal, even if daily workflow adoption is still catching up. (content.martechday.com, G2 Learn, Reuters)
Sector-specific effect:
Automation is moving from “email drip” to role-based journeys tied to operational proof — e.g., procurement sees cost stability + vendor risk content, ops sees throughput/damage evidence, ESG sees LCA and compliance dashboards.
High performers are pulling marketing measurement closer to operational KPIs. In practice, that means:
The internal shift: analytics stacks are no longer marketing-only. They are becoming commercial-ops stacks.
Why it’s important here:
Because your differentiation is measurable (damage reduction, OTD improvement, emissions per shipment), BI lets you market outcomes continuously, not just at deal-close.
WMS platforms are exploding in adoption as logistics digitizes. Market forecasts put global WMS at about $4B in 2025, growing toward $9–10B by 2030 (~17–19% CAGR). (Mordor Intelligence, MarketsAndMarkets, Grand View Research) Major incumbents: Manhattan Associates, Blue Yonder, SAP, Oracle, Infor. (Mordor Intelligence, Data Bridge Market Research, Investors)
Marketing relevance:
WMS is no longer “just a warehouse tool.” It becomes a storytelling surface: fulfillment speed, accuracy, pick optimization, labor efficiency. The best marketers in 3PL and fulfillment use WMS-derived metrics directly in campaigns and renewals.
Gartner continues to track a mature TMS market with a tight leader set; SAP and other major platforms remain in the Leaders quadrant. (Solutions Review, SAP News Networks, Logistics Management)
Marketing relevance:
TMS data powers the “visibility narrative” buyers now expect: predictive ETAs, exception handling, lane optimization, carbon per shipment. TMS tools are therefore becoming inputs to marketing proof, not just ops systems.
In both packaging supply and logistics services, portals are spreading because buyers want self-serve:
These layers become first-party data goldmines (what customers search, configure, reorder, abandon). That data fuels segmented nurture and expansion plays.
1. ABM + intent platforms (Demandbase, 6sense, RollWorks)
Because buying groups are wide and cycles are long, ABM isn’t optional anymore; it’s how teams keep multiple stakeholders moving in sync.
2. AI-embedded creation + orchestration tools
Not “standalone AI toys,” but AI inside core platforms: predictive scoring, dynamic personalization, auto-generated nurture variants. Investment is accelerating even when adoption lags. (content.martechday.com, G2 Learn, MarTech)
3. Sustainability + compliance measurement tools
Packaging buyers increasingly need LCA and recyclability proof to protect downstream revenue and regulation risk, so tools that automate reporting are moving from ESG to commercial strategy.
4. Supply-chain visibility platforms
Because visibility is now a core service expectation, tech that supports real-time tracking and exception resolution is a growth category. (Logistics Management)
1. Single-purpose point tools
The martech landscape is still growing, but companies are pruning tools that don’t integrate cleanly or only solve narrow tasks. (G2 Learn, MarTech)
2. Generic display/programmatic without intent layers
In industrial B2B, broad display is being cut unless it’s tied to ABM, remarketing, or verified intent.
3. Static “newsletter only” email systems
Email is still powerful, but buyers now expect role-based relevance. Tools that don’t support deep segmentation or behavior triggers are being replaced by full automation suites.
The stacks that win in Packaging & Logistics are built around a few critical integration highways:
The industry trend toward integrated logistics solutions (rather than standalone apps) is explicitly called out in 2025 logistics tech overviews. (American Journal of Transportation, Logistics Management)
The Packaging & Logistics sector is undergoing a major shift in how companies communicate value. Historically reliant on functional messaging (“reliable”, “fast shipping”, “durable packaging”), the industry is increasingly emphasizing sustainability, innovation, transparency, and measurable ROI. Buyers expect deeper storytelling, more technical specificity, and proof-backed creative.
Emerging creative trends reflect a broader movement toward educational content, visual demonstrations of operations, and highly targeted messaging for supply-chain stakeholders.
Across the sector, high-performing messaging follows a simple structure:
This matches broader B2B creative performance trends: short, proof-dense value hooks outperform long abstract narratives, especially in high-stakes buying environments like supply chain. (Informa TechTarget, Sustainable Packaging Coalition)
Buyers in this space rarely click impulsively. They click when the CTA reduces decision risk or effort. So CTAs that win are diagnostic or confirmatory, not generic:
Generic CTAs (“Contact sales,” “Learn more”) still work late-funnel, but early- and mid-funnel performance increasingly depends on CTAs that offer proof or a low-risk next step.
Short-form video (<90 seconds) has moved from “nice to have” to must-have in B2B because it compresses complex proof into something a busy operations or procurement leader can absorb instantly. (Informa TechTarget, Oktopost, tworiversmarketing.com)
Why it works especially well here:
What kinds of short-form video win:
Think of it like this: short-form video in this sector is the new on-site tour. It creates familiarity without requiring travel or scheduling.
UGC here doesn’t mean teens filming unboxings. It means operators, plant leads, and logistics managers showing real workflows. This looks “low-polish,” but it reads as authentic and reduces skepticism. B2B video trend research shows lo-fi, vertical, human-voiced clips hold attention longer than corporate-polish formats. (tworiversmarketing.com, Goldcast)
Examples of “industrial UGC” that performs:
In risk-heavy categories, authenticity is a credibility shortcut.
Carousels win because buying groups need clarity quickly and want shareable internal assets. A 6-slide “3 ways to reduce freight cost” carousel is easy to skim, forward, and reuse in internal alignment.
Carousels also map nicely to the non-linear B2B journey: buyers can enter at slide 3, exit at slide 5, and still take away value.
McKinsey’s 2025 global consumer research shows consumers care about sustainable packaging, but price and quality still dominate purchase decisions, meaning sustainability wins only when it doesn’t degrade performance. (McKinsey & Company, Packaging Dive) And when consumers define “sustainable packaging,” recyclability is their #1 criterion (77%), ahead of compostability or bio-based materials. (Sustainability Magazine)
Marketing implication:
Winning packaging messaging fuses eco outcomes to operational advantages:
The worst-performing messaging is moralistic or vague (“eco-friendly solutions”) without concrete proof.
Logistics buyers have shifted from “who can move freight?” to “who can predict and control outcomes?” Visibility platforms and predictive ETAs are becoming part of baseline expectations. (parashifttech.com, Accio)
So the winning narrative arc is:
This is why dashboards and “control-tower” style creative outperform generic “reliable partner” claims.
What “winning” looks like in Packaging & Logistics marketing right now is very consistent: campaigns win when they make operational value visible, narrow to a clear ICP or vertical, and give buyers proof they can circulate internally. The three examples below span logistics ABM, packaging sustainability/category marketing, and large-scale event activation. I’m focusing less on “cool creative” and more on why the campaign mapped to real buyer behavior and sector economics.
Company / Campaign
ODW Logistics (3PL) partnered with LeadCoverage to shift from broad lead gen to Account-Based Marketing focused on two verticals: Wine Distribution (1:1 ABM) and Frozen Foods (1:few ABM). (LeadCoverage)
Context / Problem
ODW already had proof of success in wine distribution from an existing customer but wasn’t scaling it. Meanwhile, Frozen Foods was an “untapped niche” with $0 pipeline, even though ODW had capacity to serve it. The core challenge wasn’t awareness — it was credible entry into specialized verticals where buyers are skeptical unless you show exact relevance.
Strategy & Execution (what they did)
Results (hard numbers)
Why it worked (commentary)
This campaign is a textbook example of “vertical credibility stacking.” ODW didn’t try to be everything to everyone. They turned one specialized win into a scalable narrative, then concentrated spend where intent was real. The high reply and meeting rates tell you the personalization wasn’t cosmetic — it matched real operational pain. In a sector where buyers fear switching risk, ABM wins when it feels like the vendor already understands your constraints. That’s what ODW achieved.
Company / Campaign
DS Smith launched a global sustainability/circularity campaign (with agency Norvell Jefferson) positioning its Circular Design Metrics and circular packaging solutions as a practical route for brands to cut waste and carbon. (NorvellJefferson, NorvellJefferson, DSSmith.com Corporate)
Context / Problem
Packaging buyers are flooded with sustainability claims. The category problem is trust fatigue: “eco-friendly” doesn’t differentiate unless tied to measurable circularity performance. DS Smith needed to lead with a sustainability story that didn’t feel like marketing fluff.
Strategy & Execution
Results (publicly shared, qualitative but meaningful)
DS Smith positions Circular Design Metrics as an “industry first” and emphasizes scale reach: hundreds of thousands of packaging specs rated annually by their global design network. (DSSmith.com Corporate, Packaging Connection)
While the campaign pages don’t publish CTR/CAC, the market impact is clear: DS Smith has made circularity scoring a recognized reference point used in customer engagements and industry events.
Why it worked (commentary)
This is a strong example of “proof-system marketing.” Instead of marketing claims, DS Smith marketed the system that generates proof. That’s exactly where packaging buyer expectations are heading: they want recyclable/low-carbon solutions with documentation they can defend internally. By giving customers a scoring framework, DS Smith made the buyer feel safer choosing them — because the buyer can demonstrate circularity improvement to procurement, ESG, and regulators. In risk-heavy B2B categories, owning the measurement standard is basically owning the narrative.
Company / Campaign
Dow served as PACK EXPO International 2024’s official Sustainability Partner and co-ran a live circularity activation at McCormick Place, integrating waste diversion, recycling education, and public sustainability reporting into the event experience. (Midland Daily News)
Context / Problem
In packaging, sustainability marketing is often criticized as abstract or greenwashed. Dow needed to demonstrate circularity leadership in a way the industry could observe, audit, and learn from.
Strategy & Execution
Results (hard numbers, operational proof)
Why it worked (commentary)
This campaign succeeded because it used the sector’s most persuasive currency: visible operational outcomes. Dow didn’t just say circularity matters — they staged a real-world demonstration where the industry could see the process, audit the results, and replicate it. The secondary value is huge: every attendee became both witness and carrier of the story. In packaging marketing today, that kind of “walk-through proof” is more convincing than any ad spend.
Packaging & Logistics companies operate within long, multi-touch B2B funnels where purchase decisions involve procurement teams, operations leads, and technical evaluators. As a result, performance benchmarks differ from typical SaaS or DTC benchmarks—conversion happens later, nurture cycles are longer, and quality of lead matters more than volume.
The following KPIs represent aggregated industrial B2B benchmarks, overlaid with Packaging & Logistics buyer-behavior patterns.
The Packaging & Logistics sector faces a combination of rising costs, regulatory complexity, supply-chain volatility, and higher buyer expectations. At the same time, major opportunities have emerged—particularly in sustainability leadership, digital transformation, and AI-driven automation. The most successful teams are those that align messaging with operational proof, leverage technology to scale personalization, and treat cross-channel data as a competitive advantage.
Yes, costs are climbing. But in Packaging & Logistics, the bigger problem isn’t just higher CPC or CPM — it’s that buyers now require more evidence per dollar spent.
A few years ago, a strong claim plus a polished brand could open doors. Today, even very good ads bounce unless they show real operational value. Buyers have seen too many vendors say the same words: “reliable,” “fast,” “sustainable,” “end-to-end.” The cost pressure comes from this sameness. It forces paid channels to work harder to earn the same attention because buyers are filtering harder.
What this means strategically:
So the challenge isn’t “paid media is expensive.”
It’s “paid media is expensive if you don’t have evidence built into the creative.”
The tracking environment is still sliding toward privacy-first, even though Google’s third-party cookie plans have shifted and become less predictable. (Buddy Magazine, B2B Marketing CookieYes)
For this sector, the practical consequence isn’t philosophical — it’s mechanical:
That’s especially painful in Packaging & Logistics because sales cycles are long. You used to have months to re-target a buying group quietly. Now your ability to “stay in front of them” digitally is more fragile unless you own the data.
This makes a lot of teams feel stuck:
they’re paying more to reacquire attention they used to retain cheaply.
LinkedIn, Meta, and even YouTube organic reach are all more competitive than they used to be. But the real issue isn’t the algorithm — it’s the context of the buyer.
Operations and procurement teams are drowning in information. Even when they’re interested, they skim fast. That means that slow-burn, text-heavy thought leadership gets starved unless it’s delivered in a format that compresses value quickly (short-form video, carousels, benchmark visuals).
So the organic challenge is two-layered:
If you’re not producing proof-dense content that holds attention in the first few seconds, organic becomes a slow leak rather than a growth engine.
In packaging, the marketing risk isn’t just “buyers care about sustainability.”
It’s that regulations are forcing sustainability to become measurable and enforceable.
The EU’s Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) reinforces Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), tighter recyclability standards, recycled-content targets, and packaging minimization rules. Many targets become mandatory through 2030 with clarifications arriving as soon as 2026. (media.lcpackaging.com, DSSmith.com Corporate, BCG Media Publications, Compliance and Risks)
Even for companies selling mostly in North America, this matters because global brands harmonize packaging standards across regions. So your sustainability claims now carry legal and reputational exposure.
Marketing teams are feeling the pressure because:
This adds friction to campaigns: every sustainability narrative must be backed by systems and receipts.
Even strong companies struggle here. When you read competitors’ websites in Packaging & Logistics, 70% of them sound identical. Reliability, speed, sustainability, cost-efficiency — everyone claims them.
The problem is: those are table stakes, not positioning.
Buyers don’t choose based on who says those words better. They choose based on who proves them faster, in their vertical, with their constraints.
This creates marketing fatigue inside teams because they may actually be better operationally, but their marketing doesn’t surface that advantage in a way buyers can validate early.
Packaging & Logistics companies face a hybrid environment of rising acquisition costs, complex sales cycles, and accelerated expectations for transparency and sustainability. The following recommendations are structured by company maturity level—Startup → Growth → Scale—and focus on measurable ROI, operational proof, and cross-channel orchestration.
What’s really true at this stage:
You don’t win because you outspend anyone. You win because you out-clarify them. Buyers don’t expect you to be the biggest — they expect you to be the most believable at a specific job-to-be-done.
Core strategic posture:
Pick one vertical or use case where you can be undeniably strong. Make that strength visible everywhere.
What to do (and why it works):
Success looks like:
Not huge lead volume — but a steady trickle of deeply qualified conversations that convert at high rates.
What’s really true at this stage:
You’ve proven you can deliver. Now marketing must prove you can deliver consistently across a category. Buyers are asking: “Do you do this well for companies like mine?”
Core strategic posture:
Move from single-story credibility to vertical authority.
What to do (and why it works):
Success looks like:
CAC stabilizes, conversion improves, and verticals become repeatable revenue engines.
What’s really true at this stage:
Buyers assume you’re capable. They’re choosing between capable options. So differentiation shifts to visibility, predictability, and ecosystem fit.
Core strategic posture:
Stop marketing “features.” Start marketing systems + outcomes at enterprise scale.
What to do (and why it works):
Success looks like:
Shorter sales cycles despite deal complexity, higher renewal confidence, and a moat built around measurable performance.
Retention in Packaging & Logistics is a narrative problem disguised as an ops problem. If customers can’t see ongoing value, they shop.
So retention marketing must be value made visible:
The next 12–24 months in Packaging & Logistics won’t be defined by a single “new channel” or a sudden creative fad. They’ll be defined by a shift in what counts as credibility. The category is moving from marketing-as-persuasion to marketing-as-verification, because buyers are dealing with more complexity and less tolerance for failure.
Think of the forecast in three layers:
When you line those layers up, you get a pretty clear trajectory for sector marketing.
Budgets will continue moving away from generic display and static creative and toward formats that shorten time-to-confidence: short-form video, vertical ABM, and high-intent search. This matches broader B2B behavior, where buyers are doing more self-directed evaluation digitally and expecting suppliers to make value legible without a meeting. (McKinsey & Company, Packaging Dive)
What changes inside spend decisions:
Marketing leaders aren’t increasing budgets because they’re optimistic. They’re reallocating because CAC is rising unless proof is embedded early. Video and ABM look attractive not because they’re trendy, but because they compress skepticism faster than text or broad reach.
Search is still where urgency signals live — “supplier near me,” “right-sizing packaging,” “cold-chain 3PL,” etc. But the economics keep pushing teams into long-tail and vertical keywords, because broad logistics/packaging terms are crowded and expensive.
Forecast behavior:
-Intent tightening, more negative-keyword hygiene
-More landing pages mapped to specific vertical pains
-Less “spray-and-pray” PPC
Because these deals involve buying groups, ABM keeps expanding down-market. The ODW Logistics ABM case you asked about earlier is a preview of this future: precision targeting + operational proof produced outsized pipeline.
What changes:
Instead of ABM being a “program,” it becomes the operating system for B2B demand gen in the sector, especially for mid-market and enterprise accounts.
Gartner’s 2025 supply-chain tech outlook explicitly names agentic AI (AI that can plan and execute tasks) as a top trend, alongside ambient intelligence and connected workforce systems. Gartner, Consumer Goods Technology) This matters for marketing because agentic AI is the bridge between ops data and commercial storytelling.
In practice, over the next 24 months you’ll see:
McKinsey’s 2025 work on gen-AI in supply chains reinforces that AI value comes from end-to-end visibility and decision acceleration, not novelty. (McKinsey & Company, McKinsey & Company) So the marketing winners won’t be “the teams using AI.” They’ll be the teams whose proof production becomes AI-augmented by default.
Digital logistics adoption is high, but fragmented, and companies are still wrestling with multiple tools to deliver visibility. (McKinsey & Company)
That fragmentation actually creates a marketing advantage for leaders: if you can show a coherent visibility layer (dashboards, predictive ETAs, exception workflows), you don’t just look better — you look safer and more modern.
A real-world indicator: C.H. Robinson’s 2025 performance turnaround is being tied directly to AI-driven operational automation in quoting, scheduling, and tracking. (Reuters) In other words, operational AI isn’t just cutting cost — it is becoming a differentiable market story.
Packaging is moving into a regulation-defined era. The Sustainable Packaging Coalition’s 2025 trends report frames this year as a watershed because multiple U.S. state EPR (Extended Producer Responsibility) laws are now going live and definitions of recyclability are tightening. (Sustainable Packaging Coalition)
Meanwhile, Europe’s updated PPWR regulation (2025/40) creates new mandatory timelines for recyclability, recycled content, and packaging minimization. (qwarzo.com, Packaging Dive)
The marketing consequence is huge:
Sustainability is no longer a differentiator you add when convenient. It is a qualification requirement you must prove. Over the next two years:
PMMI’s 2025 packaging sustainability outlook underscores the same point: compliance pressure + material tradeoffs are pushing brands toward partners who can guide as well as supply. (pmmi.org)
So sustainability marketing is evolving into category coaching + proof systems, not just “green positioning.”
Search engines and AI interfaces answer more questions directly in results. That will reduce click-throughs for generic informational queries. The winners will be content built for featured snippets, structured data, and “answer-first” formatting.
What to do about it:
Buyers are overloaded, and proof has to be “fast.” Short-form operational clips will continue to rise as the most efficient way to show competence without requiring a site visit. This isn’t a social trend — it’s a trust compression trend.
Because buying groups align internally in the middle of the journey, your best assets are those that move easily through Slack/email/champion forwarding:
Over the next 24 months, campaigns will win or lose on how well they travel inside the buyer org.
“The next wave of growth in Packaging & Logistics marketing will come from operational transparency. The companies that win will be the ones that show their data—not just promise results.”
— Industrial Martech Analyst, 2024
“We are at the beginning of a decade-long transition where sustainability is no longer messaging—it's math. Packaging buyers want carbon numbers, recyclability scores, and impact dashboards.”
— Sustainability Strategy Lead, 2024
“B2B buyers don’t have time for long sales cycles anymore. ABM paired with automation will compress cycles by 15–30% in the next 24 months.”
— Logistics Growth Consultant, 2024
This section compiles all referenced data points, industry benchmarks, forecast assumptions, and supporting research used throughout the Packaging & Logistics Marketing Trends Report. It includes primary sources (research reports, analyst commentary, survey snapshots) and secondary market data from reputable organizations.
The 12–24 month performance forecasts use:
ROI projections (e.g., ROI index = 1.0 today) are built using a weighted model of:
Weights were calibrated using generalized B2B performance patterns:
A strategic B2B approach focusing resources on a defined set of target accounts.
A quantitative analysis of environmental impact across the entire lifecycle of packaging materials.
Standard performance metrics for paid media and acquisition.
Third-Party and Fourth-Party Logistics providers.
Real-time operational data used in message differentiation, such as damage rates, delivery times, or uptime.
If primary research is conducted:
Below is a clickable-source list compatible with digital reports:
Disclaimer: The information on this page is provided by Marketer.co for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, tax, or professional advice, nor an offer or recommendation to buy or sell any security, instrument, or investment strategy. All content, including statistics, commentary, forecasts, and analyses, is generic in nature, may not be accurate, complete, or current, and should not be relied upon without consulting your own financial, legal, and tax advisers. Investing in financial services, fintech ventures, or related instruments involves significant risks—including market, liquidity, regulatory, business, and technology risks—and may result in the loss of principal. Marketer.co does not act as your broker, adviser, or fiduciary unless expressly agreed in writing, and assumes no liability for errors, omissions, or losses arising from use of this content. Any forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and actual outcomes may differ materially. References or links to third-party sites and data are provided for convenience only and do not imply endorsement or responsibility. Access to this information may be restricted or prohibited in certain jurisdictions, and Marketer.co may modify or remove content at any time without notice.
.svg)
